Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be completely ice free in five years. Gore made the prediction to a German audience in December 2008.
Eight winters later, the Earth’s Northern ice cap has not melted — not even close.
According to The Daily Caller, in 2013, an Antarctic research vessel named Akademik Shokalskiy became trapped in the ice, the problem was so severe that they actually had to rescue the 52 crew members.
In 2015, a Canadian ice breaking ship, the CCGS Amundsen, was forced to reroute and help a number of supply ships that had become trapped by ice.
Last summer, in 2016, a Global Warming Expedition was stopped in its tracks by arctic sea ice.
Back to Al Gore’s prediction from 2008, I remind you that he told his audience that “the entire North ‘polarized’ cap will disappear in 5 years.”
This wasn’t the only time Gore made his ice-free prediction. Gore’s been predicting this since 2007. That means that the North Pole should be completely melted by now.
Junk scientist Al Gore also made the same prediction in 2009.
A quick fact that again points to the contrary: In December 2015 Cairo had its first snowfall in 100 years.
11 years ago, in January 2006, Al Gore posited “within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return” and “a true planetary emergency” due to global warming.
Of course, this turned out to be false.
At least 8 highly inconvenient predictions from his “documentary” (i.e. fear-mongering hoax) never happened – not even close.
Related:
- Over 30,000 Scientists Declare Climate Change A Hoax
- Global Warming Data FAKED by Government
- 10 Prominent Scientists Refuting ‘Manmade Global Warming’ with Solid Research
- The Truth About Global Warming: We’re Not Causing It, But We’re PAYING for It
- Greenpeace Founder: Humans Not to Blame for Global Warming
- Antarctic Expeditions Confirm No Man-Made Global Warming
- Princeton Professor Debunks Man-made Global Warming Theory
- President Trump: Man-Made Global Warming is a Hoax
Reasons?
- Al Gore Made Nearly $200 Million from the Global Warming Scam — Likely to Become the World’s First ‘Carbon Billionaire’
- Soros Paid Al Gore MILLIONS to Push ‘Aggressive US Action’ on Global Warming
- Top Scientist Resigns: ‘Global Warming is a $Trillions Scam — It has Corrupted Many Scientists’
Here’s the original Al Gore video from 2008:
Update: Thousands of climate scientists and professionals have signed petitions and letters, rejecting the claims that humans are responsible for global warming.
More than 1,000 scientists challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President
Al Gore: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims (pdf)
Letter to the UN: 500 Climate Scientists & Professionals Sign Letter to UN: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
Global Warming Petition Project: 31,000 American scientists have signed a petition asking the US government to reject the Kyoto global warming agreement. A summary of peer-reviewed research is included.
Purpose of Petition: The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.
Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few “skeptics” remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.
It is evident that 31,487 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,487 American scientists are not “skeptics.”
These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.
